top of page

Independent CENOS Radio Frequency simulation software accuracy comparison with HFSS

To demonstrate CENOS accuracy we'd like to showcase a simulation of a two-element microstrip patch array done by one of our most committed beta-testers Andreas Rosenberg (Microwave Development Engineer at Weibel Scientific - Copenhagen, Denmark). It is an independent accuracy test, not affiliated with CENOS.

Andreas: “The antenna was simulated and created in such way that we could verify a new setup for an antenna measurement facility, that was made as part of a special course at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU)."

simulation.gif
farfield.png

As demonstrated in the comparison graph on the left, the results are very similar and prove that CENOS, can complete such tasks with high accuracy.

After creating the simulation Andreas decided to do a far field radiation pattern accuracy comparison between CENOS, Ansys HFSS and actual measurements done in DTU's test lab:

Accurate and rich simulation results in one click

Get accurate results fast - 3D images and animations, 2D plots.

You can even download a report in PDF format

  • Interactive 3D plots

    • farfield and radiation patterns (directivity, gain);

    • e-field.

  • 2D plots

    • S11;

    • VSWR;

    • Impedance, Resistance, Reactance; 

    • Applied Power charts;

    • radiation patterns (azimuth & elevation plane in polar and cartesian graphs).

  • Generate PDF reports and share results with others

Screen Shot 2021-06-18 at 9.30.11 PM.png
Screen Shot 2021-06-18 at 9.27.32 PM.png
bottom of page